Coal Ash Is More Radioactive than Nuclear Waste

STOP FREAKING OUT PEOPLE, COAL ASH IS MORE DANGEROUS TO YOU THAN FUKUSHIMA

 

The popular conception of nuclear power is straight out of The Simpsons: Springfield abounds with signs of radioactivity, from the strange glow surrounding Mr. Burn's nuclear power plant workers to Homer's low sperm count. Then there's the local superhero, Radioactive Man, who fires beams of "nuclear heat" from his eyes. Nuclear power, many people think, is inseparable from a volatile, invariably lime-green, mutant-making radioactivity.

Coal, meanwhile, is believed responsible for a host of more quotidian problems, such as mining accidents, acid rain and greenhouse gas emissions. But it isn't supposed to spawn three-eyed fish like Blinky.

Over the past few decades, however, a series of studies has called these stereotypes into question. Among the surprising conclusions: the waste produced by coal plants is actually more radioactive than that generated by their nuclear counterparts. In fact, the fly ash emitted by a power plant—a by-product from burning coal for electricity—carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy.

 

See the rest HERE

Radiation

So they are freaking out because they are detecting iodine-131 in Massachusetts and the Carolinas… and the ‘nuclear experts’ are screaming it’s from Fukushima… um yeah, or the very common thing we create lots of in this country that is far more radioactive than nuclear waste… what’s that substance you ask? COAL ASH.